Reviewing the Effectiveness of Public Service Policy Implementation to Enhance Citizen Satisfaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/610482Keywords:
Public Service Policy, Policy Implementation, Citizen Satisfaction, Socio-Economic Barriers, Participatory GovernanceAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of public service policy implementation in enhancing citizen satisfaction, with a focus on identifying socio-economic and cultural barriers that hinder the process. Using a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with citizens and local government officials in marginalized and rural communities to explore their experiences with public services. The study reveals that while governments strive to improve service delivery, challenges such as financial constraints, digital divides, and cultural norms persist, limiting access to essential services. The findings demonstrate that existing policies often fail to address the nuanced needs of diverse populations, particularly in areas with limited resources and technological infrastructure. By analyzing the gaps between policy formulation and actual implementation, the research highlights the importance of community-based participatory approaches, inclusive communication strategies, and targeted interventions to improve the effectiveness of public service delivery. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse on public administration and governance by proposing strategies for policymakers to enhance service accessibility, ensure equity, and promote citizen-centric governance. Future research should focus on integrating digital platforms and innovative technologies in overcoming these barriers
References
Abdou, A. M. (2021). Good governance and COVID‐19: The digital bureaucracy to response the pandemic (Singapore as a model). Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4), e2656. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2656
Althaus, C., Ball, S., Bridgman, P., Davis, G., & Threlfall, D. (2022). The Australian policy handbook: A practical guide to the policymaking process. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003351993
Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2021). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. CQ Press.
Bibri, S. E. (2021). Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future: An evidence synthesis approach to a comprehensive state-of-the-art literature review. Sustainable Futures, 3, 100047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100047
Bouzguenda, I., Alalouch, C., & Fava, N. (2019). Towards smart sustainable cities: A review of the role digital citizen participation could play in advancing social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101627
Claassen, C., & Magalhães, P. C. (2022). Effective government and evaluations of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 55(5), 869-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211036042
Edler, J., Blind, K., Kroll, H., & Schubert, T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, 52(6), 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765
Howlett, M. (2019). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Routledge.
Kilag, O. K., Miñoza, J., Comighud, E., Amontos, C., Damos, M., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Empowering Teachers: Integrating Technology into Livelihood Education for a Digital Future. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(1), 30-41.
Kulachai, W. (2023). Local government in Thailand: A way forward. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2268972. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2268972
Labadi, S., Giliberto, F., Rosetti, I., Shetabi, L., & Yildirim, E. (2021). Heritage and the sustainable development goals: Policy guidance for heritage and development actors. International Journal of Heritage Studies.
Lee, H. J., Kim, M. Y., Park, S. M., & Robertson, P. J. (2020). Public service motivation and innovation in the Korean and Chinese public sectors: Exploring the role of Confucian values and social capital. International Public Management Journal, 23(4), 496-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1639570
Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2020). “Untact”: a new customer service strategy in the digital age. Service Business, 14(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-019-00408-2
Malek, J. A., Lim, S. B., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2021). Social inclusion indicators for building citizen-centric smart cities: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010376
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government information quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Rana, T., Steccolini, I., Bracci, E., & Mihret, D. G. (2022). Performance auditing in the public sector: A systematic literature review and future research avenues. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(3), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12312
Roger, C. B., Hale, T. N., & Andonova, L. B. (2019). The comparative politics of transnational climate governance. In The Comparative Politics of Transnational Climate Governance (pp. 1-25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351135436
Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2022). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. Routledge.
Voorn, B., Van Genugten, M., & Van Thiel, S. (2019). Multiple principals, multiple problems: Implications for effective governance and a research agenda for joint service delivery. Public Administration, 97(3), 671-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12587
Wang, H., Coyte, P. C., Shi, W., Zong, X., & Zhong, R. (2023). Social Governance and Sustainable Development in Elderly Services: Innovative Models, Strategies, and Stakeholder Perspectives. Sustainability, 15(21), 15414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115414
Zhang, Z., Yu, J., & Tian, J. (2023). Community Participation, Social Capital Cultivation and Sustainable Community Renewal: A Case Study from Xi’an’s Southern Suburbs, China. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01536-x
Zina, O. (2021). The essential guide to doing your research project. Sage.
Bell, E., & Smith, K. (2022). Working within a system of administrative burden: How street-level bureaucrats’ role perceptions shape access to the promise of higher education. Administration & Society, 54(2), 167-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211027535
Suryanto, A., Saliman, S., & Sudrajat, S. (2023). The weakness of character education in indonesian teenager. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(5), 3869-3874. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i5.3721
Simonsen, K. B. (2021). Politics feeds back: The minority/majority turnout gap and citizenship in anti-immigrant times. Perspectives on Politics, 19(2), 406-421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002431
Pandey, M., Maina, R. G., Amoyaw, J., Li, Y., Kamrul, R., Michaels, C. R., & Maroof, R. (2021). Impacts of English language proficiency on healthcare access, use, and outcomes among immigrants: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 21, 1-13.
Beverley, J. (2022). Testimonio, subalternity, and narrative authority. A companion to Latin American literature and culture, 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119692591.ch32
Lingg, M., & Lütschg, V. (2020). Health system stakeholders’ perspective on the role of mobile health and its adoption in the Swiss health system: qualitative study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(5), e17315. https://doi.org/10.2196/17315
Kosec, K., & Wantchekon, L. (2020). Can information improve rural governance and service delivery?. World Development, 125, 104376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal Social Civilecial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
