Adaptive Public Administration and Policy Making in the Context of Globalization, Technology, and International Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/610488Keywords:
Innovative leadership, Public Administration, Organizational OutcomesAbstract
This paper aims to fill the gap in the literature by studying the effects of globalization on PA and the policy-making process, with specific reference to the role of IOs, technology, TAs and other actors. This research explored the nature of global public administration through the use of multiple case studies, semi-structured interviews of policymakers and practitioners, and document review. The study also shows that transnational actors including and especially the UN and the IMF are powerful political actors that can shift national policies in developing countries by offering loans, advice, and policy prescriptions. Additionally, technology takes the central position as a driver of change making processes in PAS, e-government initiatives such as online public services increase transparency, efficiency and citizens’ participation. Furthermore, the study reveals trends and patterns of networked governance that refers to collective efforts of governments, organizations, companies, and civil society in managing multifaceted global challenges. When embodying these ideas, these observations compensate for the existing shortages in the literature by providing a systematic understanding of how different globalization presupposes governance adaptability and inclusiveness. As a result, it is argued that public administration in the conditions of the modern globalization process needs innovative leadership, diverse stakeholders’ cooperation, and focus on ethical sense in terms of uncertainty and variety of the global world. The findings of this study are important to policy makers concerned with building strong and adequate public administration for responding to the challenges arising from globalization.
References
Ballor, G. A., & Yildirim, A. B. (2020). Multinational corporations and the politics of international trade in multidisciplinary perspective. Business and Politics, 22(4), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2020.14
Buckley, P. J. (2020). The theory and empirics of the structural reshaping of globalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(9), 1580. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00355-5
Carayannis, T., & Weiss, T. G. (2021). The" third" United Nations: how a knowledge ecology helps the UN think. Oxford University Press, USA.
Chattu, V. K. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain technology applications in medicine and global health. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 5(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc5030041
Demestichas, K., & Daskalakis, E. (2020). Information and communication technology solutions for the circular economy. Sustainability, 12(18), 7272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187272
Downie, C. (2022). Transnational actors: Nongovernmental organizations, civil society and individuals. In Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (pp. 187-199). Routledge.
Dunn, R. (2020). Adaptive leadership: Leading through complexity. International studies in educational administration, 48(1), 31-38.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper:“So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Farazmand, A. (Ed.). (2023). Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance. Springer Nature.
Head, J. (2021). The future of the global economic organizations: an evaluation of criticisms leveled at the IMF, the multilateral development banks, and the WTO. In The Future of the Global Economic Organizations. Brill Nijhoff.
Isabelle, D., Horak, K., McKinnon, S., & Palumbo, C. (2020). Is Porter's Five Forces Framework Still Relevant? A study of the capital/labour intensity continuum via mining and IT industries. Technology innovation management review, 10(6).
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2020). Globalization: What's new? What's not? (And so, what?). In Making policy happen (pp. 105-113). Routledge.
Kim, R. E. (2020). Is global governance fragmented, polycentric, or complex? The state of the art of the network approach. International Studies Review, 22(4), 903-931. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz052
Knuckey, S., Hoffman, B., Perelman, J., Reddy, G., Ancheita, A., & Jain, M. (2020). Power in human rights advocate and rightsholder relationships: critiques, reforms, and challenges. Harv. Hum. Rts. J., 33, 1.
Kuzmin, O., Bublyk, M., Shakhno, A., Korolenko, O., & Lashkun, H. (2020). Innovative development of human capital in the conditions of globalization. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 166, p. 13011). EDP Sciences.
Laihonen, H., & Huhtamäki, J. (2023). Organisational hybridity and fluidity: deriving new strategies for dynamic knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(2), 216-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1794993
Raihan, A., Rashid, M., Voumik, L. C., Akter, S., & Esquivias, M. A. (2023). The dynamic impacts of economic growth, financial globalization, fossil fuel, renewable energy, and urbanization on load capacity factor in Mexico. Sustainability, 15(18), 13462. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813462
Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2022). Introducing public administration. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191322
Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., ... & Moore, L. (2021). Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 25(57), 1. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25570
Sun, P., Doh, J. P., Rajwani, T., & Siegel, D. (2021). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818-1853. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x
Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2022). Analysing the importance of e-government in times of disruption: The case of public education in Rwanda during Covid-19 lockdown. Evaluation and Program Planning, 91, 102064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102064
Vrabie, C. (2023). E-Government 3.0: An AI model to use for enhanced local democracies. Sustainability, 15(12), 9572. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129572
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal Social Civilecial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.