The Paradox of Digital Transparency in the Implementation of Open Government in Gowa Regency

Peby Wayasirli Amriani; Sangkala Sangkala; M. Thahir  Haning; Muhammad  Yunus

doi:10.71435/738264

Authors

Peby Wayasirli Amriani Hasanuddin University
Sangkala Hasanuddin University
M. Thahir Haning Hasanuddin University
Muhammad Yunus Hasanuddin University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/738264

Keywords:

PPID Transparency, Digitalization, Public Service, Open Government

Abstract

This study examines the paradox of digital transparency in the implementation of Open Government in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, where strong digital infrastructure has not fully produced substantive public information disclosure. Using a qualitative case study design, the research explores how technological capacity, organizational responsiveness, and cross-sectoral coordination shape transparency outcomes within the Public Information and Documentation Officer (PPID) system. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with seven key informants, consisting of the Main PPID and Assistant PPID administrators from strategic regional agencies, and through document analysis of public information service reports, regulatory documents, standard operating procedures, and PPID data from 2021 to April 2026. The findings show that Gowa Regency has achieved digital sovereignty through an independently managed server and integrated PPID portal, enabling broader formal access to information. However, transparency remains largely procedural due to a 39 percent cumulative rejection rate of information requests, role ambiguity among PPID administrators, fragmented human resource capacity, and weak synchronization between the Main PPID and Assistant PPIDs. The study reveals that digital platforms function more as symbolic instruments when not supported by dedicated personnel, clear institutional roles, responsive procedures, and integrated data governance. These findings confirm that Open Government cannot be realized through technology alone but requires organizational capacity and managerial accountability. The study recommends strengthening functional information management positions, improving inter-agency data integration, and institutionalizing responsive service standards to transform digital transparency into substantive public accountability. The results contribute to local governance studies and practical reform in Indonesia and beyond.

References

Agu, J. C., Nkwo, F. N., & Eneiga, R. U. (2024). Governance and anti-corruption measures in Nigeria: Strategies for enhancing transparency, accountability and public trust. International Journal of Economics and Public Policy, 8(1), 1-15.

Alexopoulos, C., Saxena, S., Janssen, M., & Rizun, N. (2023). Whither the need and motivation for open government data (OGD) promotional strategies?. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 25(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220004

Alnahari, M. S., & Ariaratnam, S. T. (2022). The application of blockchain technology to smart city infrastructure. Smart Cities, 5(3), 979-993. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030049

Anas, A., Arifin, I., Irwan, A. L., & Ansar, M. C. (2024). The The Application of E-Government in the Development of Village Government Democracy in Gowa Regency Indonesia. Jurnal Publisitas, 10(2), 173-185.

Ansari, B., Barati, M., & Martin, E. G. (2022). Enhancing the usability and usefulness of open government data: A comprehensive review of the state of open government data visualization research. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101657. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220004

Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public administration, 101(1), 3-22.

Arif, A., Susanti, G., & Rusdi, M. (2026). Holistic Digital Service Transformation of Motor Vehicle Tax as a Strategy to Enhance Compliance and Regional Original Revenue Realization: A Case Study. Journal La Bisecoman, 7(3), 690-617. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v7i3.3320

Azzahra, A. (2023). Implementation of good governance in public services at local government. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(7), 1899-1906.

Balaji, K. (2025). E-Government and E-Governance: Driving digital transformation in public administration. Public governance practices in the age of AI, 23-44.

Barsha, S., & Munshi, S. A. (2024). Implementing artificial intelligence in library services: A review of current prospects and challenges of developing countries. Library Hi Tech News, 41(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-07-2023-0126

Chen, M., & Grossklags, J. (2022). Social control in the digital transformation of society: A case study of the Chinese Social Credit System. Social sciences, 11(6), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060229

Ejjami, R. (2024). Public administration 5.0: Enhancing governance and public services with smart technologies. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 1-35.

Hamka, Y., & Hasni, A. B. (2025). The Implementation of E-Government Systems and Their Effect on Bureaucratic Efficiency in Local Government Administration in West Java. Moccasin Journal De Public Perspective, 2(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.37899/mjdpp.v2i2.278

Hediger, V., & Vonderau, P. (2025). Record, rhetoric, rationalization: Industrial organization and film. In Films That Work (pp. 35-49). Routledge.

Herawati, A. R., Pradana, A. E., & Dwimawanti, I. H. (2025). Review of E-government Policy as the Foundation for Smart City Transformation in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges. KnE Social Sciences, 10(16), 120-140.

Khan, A. (2025). A Quantitative Assessment of AI-Driven Predictive Analytics for Economic Development Decision Support in US Public Policy Centers. ASRC Procedia: Global Perspectives in Science and Scholarship, 1(01), 2364-2405. https://doi.org/10.63125/0n7av251

König, P. D., Felfeli, J., Achtziger, A., & Wenzelburger, G. (2024). The importance of effectiveness versus transparency and stakeholder involvement in citizens’ perception of public sector algorithms. Public Management Review, 26(4), 1061-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2144938

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y. (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818

Li, C. (2025). AI-driven governance: Enhancing transparency and accountability in public administration. Digital Society & Virtual Governance, 1(1), 1-16.

Lourenço, R. P. (2023). Government transparency: Monitoring public policy accumulation and administrative overload. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101762.

Lu, J., Ranjan, P., Floress, K., Arbuckle, J. G., Church, S. P., Eanes, F. R., ... & Prokopy, L. S. (2022). A meta-analysis of agricultural conservation intentions, behaviors, and practices: Insights from 35 years of quantitative literature in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116240

Mamokhere, J. (2022). Accountability, inclusivity, effectiveness, and leaving no one behind: An exploration of effective governance principles in ensuring clean water and sanitation in South African municipalities. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(10), 191-205.

Mardjun, R., Kamuli, S., & Tohopi, R. (2025). Sectoral Statistical Data Processing Strategy at the Communication, Informatics and Statistics Service of Gorontalo Province. Journal Dimensie Management and Public Sector, 6(1), 11-22.

Matemba, J. D., & Mwandosya, G. I. (2023). Investigating the impacts of information and communication technology systems in conducting population census in tanzania: A case of national bureau of statistics. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(4), 1015-1022.

Matheus, R., Faber, R., Ismagilova, E., & Janssen, M. (2023). Digital transparency and the usefulness for open government. International Journal of Information Management, 73, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108678568

Mkhitaryan, K., Sanamyan, A., Hambardzumyan, H., Ordyan, A., & Harutyunyan, G. (2026). Digitalizing Urban Planning Governance: Empirical Evidence from Yerevan and a Multi-Layer Framework for Data-Driven City Management. Urban Science, 10(4), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci10040183

Muneeb, D., Khattak, A., Wahba, K., Abdalla, S., & Ahmad, S. Z. (2023). Dynamic capabilities as a strategic flexibility enabler: organizational responsiveness to COVID-19. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 17(4), 824-849.

Olatinsu, O., & Eke, C. (2025). Audit trails, financial transparency, and internal control effectiveness in public financial management systems. International Journal of Research in Management, 7(1), 1352-1363. https://www.doi.org/10.33545/26648792.2025.v7.i1n.556

Porumbescu, G., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2022). Government transparency: State of the art and new perspectives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108678568

Purnamasari, R., Hasanudin, A. I., Zulfikar, R., & Yazid, H. (2025). Technological infrastructure and financial resource availability in enhancing public services and government performance: The role of digital innovation adoption in Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101621

Rachmad, Y. E. (2024). Public Provision and Prosperity: The Mechanics of Food Distribution in Gibran's Era.

Reggi, L., Dawes, S. S., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2022). The effects of open government data on the inclusiveness of governance networks: Identifying management strategies and success factors. Information Polity, 27(4), 473-490.

Roberts, A. (2023). Transparency in government. In Public Management and Governance (pp. 329-340). Routledge.

Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuk, R. S., & Clerkin, R. M. (2022). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector. Routledge.

Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, R. H. (2025). Digital transformation in governance: The impact of e-governance on public administration and transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362-379.

Shenkoya, T. (2023). Can digital transformation improve transparency and accountability of public governance in Nigeria?. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-08-2022-0115

Sonnenfeld, A., Stevenson, J., & Waddington, H. S. (2024). Does citizen engagement improve development outcomes? A realist-informed systematic review of participation and accountability mechanisms. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 16(1), 27-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2022.2153380

Suresh, H., Tseng, E., Young, M., Gray, M., Pierson, E., & Levy, K. (2024, June). Participation in the age of foundation models. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 1609-1621).

Timilehin, O. (2024). Open Government in Practice Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Nations.

Veselova, N. Y., Aksenova, Z. A., Ishchenko, O. V., Bichkova, N. P., & Lenkova, M. I. (2022). Implementation of Digital Technologies in the Communication Service Management System: Legal and Informational Aspects. In Digital Technologies and Institutions for Sustainable Development (pp. 599-603). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04289-8_102

Wang, Y., & Chen, H. (2022). Blockchain: A potential technology to improve the performance of collaborative emergency management with multi-agent participation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72, 102867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102867

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2381.