Accountable Governance in the Procurement of Goods and Services in Teluk Bintuni Regency

Authors

  • Hellyn Kristiono Doctoral Student of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Hasniati Hasniati Department of Administrative Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin
  • Muh. Akmal Ibrahim Department of Administrative Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/738158

Keywords:

Accountable Governance, Responsibility, Procurement of Goods and Services

Abstract

This study aims to understand the application of accountable governance principles in goods and services procurement practices in Teluk Bintuni Regency through the aspects of Publicity, Supervision, Audit, Responsibility, and Sanction using a qualitative approach. The research focused on local government institutions directly involved in the procurement process. Informants were selected purposively based on their roles and involvement. The results of this study indicateSeveral findings, the first of which is that in Teluk Bintuni Regency, publicity has been institutionalized through an electronic system, but has not yet achieved substantive transparency. Furthermore, other findings indicate that although procurement supervision in Teluk Bintuni Regency has been designed in a layered manner, its implementation is still fragmented and tends to be administrative. Likewise, audit practices in Teluk Bintuni Regency still tend to be oriented towards administrative compliance. In terms of the division of roles, it has been understood and implemented administratively, but responsibility is still interpreted only as fulfilling procedures, not as a substantive commitment to quality and the public interest. And finally, the results of the study also show the weak implementation of sanctions in Teluk Bintuni Regency, reflecting what Mulgan (2000) calls "toothless accountability."

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Routledge.

Hood, C. (2010). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton University Press.

Hood, C., & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford University Press.

Hood, C., James, O., Peters, B. G., & Scott, C. (2001). Regulation Inside Government. Oxford University Press.

INTOSAI. (2013). Fundamental Principles of Public-Sector Auditing. Vienna.

Joss, S. (2010). Accountable Governance. Routledge.

Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94-108.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mulgan, R. (2000). Accountability: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555-573.

OECD. (2015). Public Procurement for Innovation. OECD Publishing.

O'Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112-126.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform. Oxford University Press.

Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.

Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Kristiono, H., Hasniati, H., & Ibrahim, M. A. . (2025). Accountable Governance in the Procurement of Goods and Services in Teluk Bintuni Regency. Journal Social Civilecial, 3(3), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.71435/738158