Poverty, Local Government Performance, And Voting Behavior: A Approach Econometrics to Performance Evaluation In Election District Head
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/741472Keywords:
Poverty, Performance Government Area, Regression Logistics, Decentralization Fiscal, Economic Political LocalAbstract
This study examines the relationship between household poverty status, satisfaction with incumbent government performance, and voters’ decisions to re-elect the incumbent local government leader in Belu Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. The study employed a quantitative research design using a survey approach. Data were collected from 273 respondents selected through multistage random sampling. The variables consisted of household poverty status and satisfaction with incumbent government performance as independent variables, while the decision to re-elect the incumbent served as the dependent variable. All variables were measured using binary categories. Household poverty status was classified based on the applicable poverty threshold, while satisfaction with government performance and electoral preference were categorized according to respondents’ survey responses. The data were analyzed using binary logistic regression estimated through the Maximum Likelihood Estimation method in SPSS. The results show that household poverty status was not significantly associated with the decision to re-elect the incumbent (B = 0.005, p = 0.987, Exp(B) = 1.005). In contrast, satisfaction with incumbent government performance had a positive and statistically significant association with electoral preference (B = 3.009, p < 0.001, Exp(B) = 20.269). Respondents who were satisfied with the incumbent’s performance had substantially higher odds of supporting the incumbent’s re-election than those who were not satisfied. The findings suggest that voters’ evaluations of government performance were more strongly associated with electoral support than household poverty status. Therefore, economic disadvantage did not appear to independently weaken performance-based electoral accountability within the estimated model.
References
Abumbe, G. T., & Owa, O. E. (2024). Democracy and electoral integrity in the Nigerian 2023 general elections: an assessment. Global Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), 117-141.
Agyemang-Duah, W., Kafui Gbedoho, E., Peprah, P., Arthur, F., Kweku Sobeng, A., Okyere, J., & Mengba Dokbila, J. (2018). Reducing poverty through fiscal decentralization in Ghana and beyond: A review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1476035.
Asif, M., & Ullah, S. (2026). Performance voting vs. identity voting: An analysis of electoral behaviour in Pakistani districts. JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 9(1.2026).
Bardhan, P. (2022). A world of insecurity: Democratic disenchantment in rich and poor countries. Harvard University Press.
Boateng, K. D. (2025). Electoral Performance of Incumbent Governments in Ghana’s Fourth Republic (Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana).
Bredvold, T. L., & Inderberg, T. H. J. (2022). Shockingly cold and electricity-dependent in a rich context: Energy poor households in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102745.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Wetterberg, A. (2016). Gauging the effects of social accountability on services, governance, and citizen empowerment. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 274-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1245
Bucci, V., Ferrara, G., & Resce, G. (2024). Local government spending efficiency and fiscal decentralization: evidence from Italian municipalities. Applied Economics, 56(5), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2169241
Célérier, L., & Cuenca Botey, L. E. (2015). Participatory budgeting at a community level in Porto Alegre: a Bourdieusian interpretation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 739-772. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12399
Chiru, M. (2025). Clientelism, party organization and intra-party democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 58(4), 680-713.
Cooperman, A. D. (2024). Bloc voting for electoral accountability. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1222-1239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000989
Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1804036. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
Fahad, S., Nguyen-Thi-Lan, H., Nguyen-Manh, D., Tran-Duc, H., & To-The, N. (2023). Analyzing the status of multidimensional poverty of rural households by using sustainable livelihood framework: policy implications for economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 16106-16119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23143-0
Gennetian, L. A., & Shafir, E. (2015). The persistence of poverty in the context of financial instability: A behavioral perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(4), 904-936. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21854
Gingrich, J., & Watson, S. (2016). Privatizing participation? The impact of private welfare provision on democratic accountability. Politics & Society, 44(4), 573-613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216674005
Graham, J., Larreguy, H., & Querubín, P. (2026). Clientelism: How it works, why it persists and how to break it.
Grossman, G., & Slough, T. (2022). Government responsiveness in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-112501
Iddrisu, W. A. (2026). Understanding Ghana’s 2024 presidential election: a three-level multilevel modelling approach. Quality & Quantity, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-026-03055-8
Igliozzi, D. T. (2025). Give People Money: The Effect of Perceived inequality in Everyday Life and Previous Cash-Transfer Programs on Support for Universal Basic income (Doctoral dissertation, Loyola University Chicago).
Li, X., & Zheng, B. (2025). Social welfare expansion and political support during economic slowdown: A panel data analysis of China, 2010–2018. Social Science Research, 125, 103112.
Lieberman, E., Martin, P., & McMurry, N. (2021). When do strong parties “throw the bums out”? Competition and accountability in South African candidate nominations. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(3), 316-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09338-5
Luke, P. L. (2023). From the City to the Countryside–Gentrification Across the US: Conceptualizing Displacement Pressure, Constructing Novel Measurement Methodology, and Exploring Connections to Health (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina).
Martinez‐Vazquez, J., Lago‐Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095-1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182
Mboneni, A. (2023). Political instability affects service delivery: an assessment of Dr Beyers Naude Local Municipality from 1994-2017 (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
McKay, L., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2024). Understanding the geography of discontent: Perceptions of government’s biases against left-behind places. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(6), 1719-1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2277381
Morales, M., & Belmar, F. (2022). Clientelism, turnout and incumbents’ performance in Chilean local government elections. Social Sciences, 11(8), 361. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080361
Mpembyemungu, W. (2019). Factors influencing the accountability of district councillors in Rwanda. African Journal of Public Affairs, 11(2), 20-40.
Munck, G. L. (2024). The state as a determinant of democracy: durable poor-quality democracies in contemporary Latin America. Democratization, 31(2), 341-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2267992
Pildes, R. H. (2023). The neglected value of effective government. U. Chi. Legal F., 185.
Ragolane, M., & Malatji, T. L. (2024). An investigation into the causes and impact of service delivery protests on political stability: perceptions from the social contract and relative deprivation. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2024.003122
Rosset, J. (2023). Perceptions of (unequal) responsiveness and their consequences for electoral participation. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(8), 1565-1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2094989
Scheiring, G., Serrano-Alarcón, M., Moise, A., McNamara, C., & Stuckler, D. (2024). The populist backlash against globalization: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. British Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 892-916.
Setiawan, A., Tjiptoherijanto, P., Mahi, B. R., & Khoirunurrofik, K. (2022). The impact of local government capacity on public service delivery: Lessons learned from decentralized Indonesia. Economies, 10(12), 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10120323
Stutzmann, S. (2025). Asymmetric backlash against structural economic change: The electoral consequences of the coal phase‐out in Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 64(4), 1643-1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.70003
Syrda, J. (2026). Political ideology and poverty boundaries: Definitional mediation in perceptions of poverty in Britain. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 101187.
Talving, L. (2017). The electoral consequences of austerity: Economic policy voting in Europe in times of crisis. West European Politics, 40(3), 560-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1271600
Tsai, C. H., Weng, T. W., & Tan, A. C. (2026). Performance Voting in a Multiparty Contest: A Case Study of the 2024 Taiwan's Presidential Election. Representation, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2026.2697729
Wallace, J. L. (2016). Juking the stats? Authoritarian information problems in China. British journal of political science, 46(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000106
Wang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, T., Jiang, B., & Wang, X. (2024). Impact of fiscal decentralization and local government competition on the supply of basic public services: Based on the empirical evidence of prefecture-level cities in China. Heliyon, 10(4).
Wang, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, T., Jiang, B., & Wang, X. (2024). Impact of fiscal decentralization and local government competition on the supply of basic public services: Based on the empirical evidence of prefecture-level cities in China. Heliyon, 10(4).
Yahampath, D., Stankov, P., & Enilov, M. (2025). When will Voters Re-elect Populists? Lessons from COVID-19 in Brazil. Comparative Economic Studies, 67(4), 867-895. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-025-00261-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal Development Manecos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


