Dynamic Social Psychology in Group Interaction Patterns and Their Influence on Conformity and Identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/621422Keywords:
Social Psychology, Conformity Behaviour, Group IdentificationAbstract
The proposed study explores the relations and interactions of social psychology when applied to groups of people, that is, how people behave conformingly and how they identify with their groups. The aim was to investigate how people are converging with the norms of groups, and how individuals are examining the effect that identification with groups has on convergence. This research was conducted under the form of a quantitative correlational study using a structured questionnaire, which was applied to 320 students in a university actively working on group based academic and extracurricular activities. Verified measures addressed conformity tendency and group identification, and interaction pattern, whereas correlation, regression, and ANOVA tests were used to gauge correlation, difference between demographical and disciplinary groups. The results have indicated the existence of a strong positive correlation between group identification to conductive behavior as well as interaction patterns that also became significant predictors. This set of variables combined contributed to 42 percent of variance in conformity which shows that psychology and group level forces play a significant role in the conformity. Disciplinary differences still indicated that conformity is not universal but it varies depending on the circumstances. It is interesting to note that gender and age were not significant predictors indicating that conformity is more of a social identity process than a demographic factor. These findings have great theoretical and practical implications. They are further sharpening the Social Identity Theory due to the active process of negotiation of belonging and autonomy within modern group dynamics, including in digital and hybrid settings. Practically, the paper provides organizational leaders, educators and policymakers with the information about how they can influence constructive identification and reduce the occurrence risks of over conformity. The positioning of conformity in the context of a changing social and cultural environment develops the body of knowledge in the field of study and also offers applicable information that can be used in managing collective behaviors.
References
Albarello, F., Crocetti, E., & Rubini, M. (2018). I and us: A longitudinal study on the interplay of personal and social identity in adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 47, 689-702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0791-4
Andrew, D. P., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2019). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics.
Charness, G., & Chen, Y. (2020). Social identity, group behavior, and teams. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 691-713. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-091619-032800
Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.
Conrad, L. Y., & Tucker, V. M. (2019). Making it tangible: hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews. Journal of Documentation, 75(2), 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2018-0091
Dutton, J. E., & Ragins, B. R. (Eds.). (2017). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. Psychology Press.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Fadilla, P. F., Abdullah, S. M., & Wu, M. (2020). Does conformity occur during students' decision making for their careers?. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 1-9.
Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
Granovetter, M. (2017). Society and economy: Framework and principles. Harvard University Press.
Jamieson, D. W., Milbrandt, J. M., & Daly, N. M. Z. (2019). 13. Exploring the dynamics of organizational culture and change: developing skills and strategies to navigate change in a complex world. Preparing for High Impact Organizational Change, 156. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116954.00023
Marrone, M., & Hazelton, J. (2019). The disruptive and transformative potential of new technologies for accounting, accountants and accountability: A review of current literature and call for further research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(5), 677-694. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2019-0508
Nair, N., & Selvaraj, P. (2021). Using a cultural and social identity lens to understand pandemic responses in the US and India. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 21(3), 545-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958211057363
Nicholson, J., & Kurucz, E. (2019). Relational leadership for sustainability: Building an ethical framework from the moral theory of ‘ethics of care’. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3593-4
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
Pillai, K. G., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kalyanaram, G., & Nair, S. R. (2017). The negative effects of social capital in organizations: A review and extension. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12085
Ramzan, M., Javaid, Z. K., & Fatima, M. (2023). Empowering ESL Students: Harnessing the Potential of Social Media to Enhance Academic Motivation in Higher Education. Global Digital & Print Media Review, VI, 2, 224-237. https://doi.org/10.31703/gdpmr.2023(VI-II).15
Shiraev, E. B., & Levy, D. A. (2020). Cross-cultural psychology: Critical thinking and contemporary applications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244261
Søraa, R. A., Tøndel, G., Kharas, M. W., & Serrano, J. A. (2023). What do older adults want from social robots? A qualitative research approach to human-robot interaction (HRI) studies. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(3), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00914-w
Spears, R. (2021). Social influence and group identity. Annual review of psychology, 72, 367-390.
Steffens, N. K., Munt, K. A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2021). Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(1), 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620962569
Tilly, Z., Kwan, L. Z., & shu Shin, L. (2022). Unraveling the Threads: A Comprehensive Analysis of Government Policies on Unemployment, Worker Empowerment, and Labor Market Dynamics. Law and Economics, 16(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v16i1.52
Williams, G. (2019). Applied qualitative research design. Scientific e-Resources.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal Social Humanity Perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

