Gender Representation in Politics And its Impact on Policymaking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/621415Keywords:
Gender representation, Politics, PolicymakingAbstract
This study used a qualitative research design to investigate the barriers to political engagement faced by women and gender minorities, as well as how gender diversity in politics affects policy results. This study dives into the experiences, viewpoints, and hurdles that impede gender representation in politics through in-depth interviews with political officials, policymakers, and gender advocates, as well as focus group talks with citizens and activists. Thematic analysis indicates the persistence of gender stereotypes, institutional and systemic barriers, political violence, and cultural norms that restrict women's and gender minorities' full and equal involvement. this study reveals the importance of gender representation in policymaking. Gender-diverse legislatures highlight social welfare issues and fight for gender equality and social justice measures. When women and gender minorities participate actively in political decision-making, policies become more inclusive, addressing the specific interests and concerns of varied communities. This study emphasizes the significance of enacting gender-sensitive policies, advocating gender quotas, and fostering supportive and inclusive political settings in order to overcome these hurdles and develop gender-inclusive policymaking. The study also emphasizes gender representation's revolutionary power in transforming political discourse and encouraging increased public participation. The findings highlight the critical importance of continuing to advocate for gender equality in politics and addressing the impediments that perpetuate underrepresentation.
References
Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883-901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352
Bardall, G., Bjarnegård, E., & Piscopo, J. M. (2020). How is political violence gendered? Disentangling motives, forms, and impacts. Political Studies, 68(4), 916-935. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719881812
Cai, A., Bentley, C. M., Zamani, E., Naiseh, M., & Sbaffi, L. (2023, July). Intersectional Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities of Equitable Remote Operation in the UK Maritime Sector. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.1145/3597512.3600202
Dubé, K., Kanazawa, J., Campbell, C., Boone, C. A., Maragh-Bass, A. C., Campbell, D. M., ... & Sauceda, J. A. (2022). Considerations for increasing racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual diversity in HIV cure-related research with analytical treatment interruptions: a qualitative inquiry. AIDS research and human retroviruses, 38(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2021.0023
Finlay, R., & Hopkins, P. (2019). Young Muslim women's political participation in Scotland: Exploring the intersections of gender, religion, class and place. Political Geography, 74, 102046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102046
Krook, M. L., & Sanín, J. R. (2020). The cost of doing politics? Analyzing violence and harassment against female politicians. Perspectives on Politics, 18(3), 740-755. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719001397
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020). The future (s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183
Magni, G., & Reynolds, A. (2021). Voter preferences and the political underrepresentation of minority groups: Lesbian, gay, and transgender candidates in advanced democracies. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1199-1215. https://doi.org/10.1086/712142
Pincock, K., & Jones, N. (2020). Challenging power dynamics and eliciting marginalized adolescent voices through qualitative methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920958895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920958895
Prillaman, S. A. (2023). Strength in numbers: how women's groups close India's political gender gap. American Journal of Political Science, 67(2), 390-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12651
Reshi, I. A., & Sudha, T. (2022). Women Empowerment: A Literature Review. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 2(6), 1353-1359.
Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Senk, K. (2020). The Challenges of Gender Representation in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 55(2), 391-396. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.889
Siim, B., & Fiig, C. (2021). The populist challenge to gender equality. In The Routledge Handbook of Gender and EU Politics (pp. 367-379). Routledge.
Terraza, H., Orlando, M. B., Lakovits, C., Lopes Janik, V., & Kalashyan, A. (2020). Handbook for gender-inclusive urban planning and design.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal Social Humanity Perspective

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

