Best Practices for Enhancing Student Metacognitive Skills through Innovative Teaching Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/610407Keywords:
Metacognition, Reflective Learning, FeedbackAbstract
In this study, effective, efficient, and impractical method of cultivating metacognition in learners, such as strategy, difficulty level, and feedback system, are investigated as part of a qualitative analysis. Using semi structured interviews, focus group discussion and classroom observation research data was collected from 15 educators and 30 students of different class levels. Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns, resulting in four key themes: these issues as metacognitive strategies, students’ engagement, factors inhibiting implementation of metacognition strategies, and feedback. The research presented in this paper shows that the approaches which foster guided reflection, self- assessment, peer cooperation, as well as the forms of scaffolded learning have a positive impact on the development of metacognitive skills. Teachers also insisted that feedback is useful as a metacognitive strategy for enhancing students’ thinking skills and raising autonomy levels. Nevertheless, some constraints including restricted time for instructions, fixed curriculum and diverse students’ learning achievements were reported as the factors which hinder the proper utilization of these strategies. The study filled the gap identified in the literature review by offering concrete, contextualised suggestions on how metacognition may be enacted in a specific institutional and timetabled context, as well as how students may be supported in terms of the institutional structures necessary for metacognition to flourish. This provides further evidence of the need for preservice and inservice teacher education and professional development, curriculum accommodation, and creation of equitable learning environments to promote metacognition across learner contexts. This work further enriches the discussion on metacognition by drawing attention to specific practical approaches and underlining the importance of continuing support mechanisms in learning.
References
Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., ... & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11).
Akcaoğlu, M. Ö., Mor, E., & Külekçi, E. (2023). The mediating role of metacognitive awareness in the relationship between critical thinking and self-regulation. Thinking skills and creativity, 47, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101187
Ashtari, N., Mullins, R., Qian, C., Wexler, J., Tenney, I., & Pushkarna, M. (2023, July). From Discovery to Adoption: Understanding the ML Practitioners’ Interpretability Journey. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 2304-2325). https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596046
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Casselman, M. D. (2021). Transitioning from High-Stakes to Low-Stakes Assessment for Online Courses. In Advances in Online Chemistry Education (pp. 21-34). American Chemical Society.
Cervin-Ellqvist, M., Larsson, D., Adawi, T., Stöhr, C., & Negretti, R. (2021). Metacognitive illusion or self-regulated learning? Assessing engineering students’ learning strategies against the backdrop of recent advances in cognitive science. Higher Education, 82(3), 477-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00635-x
Cheng, E. C., & Chan, J. K. (2021). Developing metacognitive teaching strategies through lesson study. Springer Singapore.
Costa, R. D., Souza, G. F., Valentim, R. A., & Castro, T. B. (2020). The theory of learning styles applied to distance learning. Cognitive Systems Research, 64, 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2020.3008131
Daniel, J., & Williams, K. J. (2021). Self-questioning strategy for struggling readers: A synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 42(4), 248-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519880338
Luo, H., Li, G., Feng, Q., Yang, Y., & Zuo, M. (2021). Virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 887-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12538
Malecka, B., & Boud, D. (2023). Fostering student motivation and engagement with feedback through ipsative processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(7), 1761-1776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928061
Marantika, J. E. R. (2021). Metacognitive ability and autonomous learning strategy in improving learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 88-96.
Mazancieux, A., Pereira, M., Faivre, N., Mamassian, P., Moulin, C. J., & Souchay, C. (2023). Towards a common conceptual space for metacognition in perception and memory. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(12), 751-766.
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2020). Training learning strategies to promote self-regulation and transfer: The knowledge, belief, commitment, and planning framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1363-1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620920723
Muijs, D., & Bokhove, C. (2020). Metacognition and Self-Regulation: Evidence Review. Education Endowment Foundation.
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
Sato, M. (2022). Metacognition. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 95-110). Routledge.
Satterstrom, P., Kerrissey, M., & DiBenigno, J. (2021). The voice cultivation process: How team members can help upward voice live on to implementation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2), 380-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839220962795
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Suminto, E. A., & Mbato, C. L. (2020). The implementation of metacognition in teaching character education in primary education. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(1), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v8i1.1255
Sundgren, M., & Jaldemark, J. (2020). Visualizing online collaborative writing strategies in higher education group assignments. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 351-373. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2020-0018
Teng, F. (2020). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
Varpio, L., Paradis, E., Uijtdehaage, S., & Young, M. (2020). The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Academic medicine, 95(7), 989-994. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075
Whitebread, D., & Neale, D. (2020). Metacognition in early child development. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(1), 8. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/tps0000223
Wong, Z. Y., & Liem, G. A. D. (2022). Student engagement: Current state of the construct, conceptual refinement, and future research directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09628-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Educia Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



